On 09/17/2012 11:46 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote: > Patch1 fix new found possible bug. > > Patch2 use async algorithm to replace the synchronous algorithm to rebind > idle workers. > > The synchronous algorithm requires 3 hand shakes, it introduces much > complicated. > > The new async algorithm does not do any synchronization. it removes > the idle workers from idle_list to ensure the local-wake-up is correct > instead. > > Patch3-7 do simple cleanup > > Patch2-7 are ready for for-next. I have other devlopment and cleanup for > workqueue, > should I wait this patchset merged or send them at the same time?
Hello, Tejun: Please defer Patch3-7, because they conflict with the merged one. Could you please review and merge the the Patch2(async idle rebinding). I have made some effort to write/review/check it. Thanks, Lai > > Lai Jiangshan (7): > workqueue: clear WORKER_REBIND unconditionaly in > busy_worker_rebind_fn() > workqueue: async idle rebinding > workqueue: new day don't need WORKER_REBIND for busy rebinding > workqueue: remove WORKER_REBIND > workqueue: rename manager_mutex to assoc_mutex > workqueue: use __cpuinit instead of __devinit for cpu callback > workqueue: use hotcpu_notifier() for workqueue_cpu_down_callback() > > kernel/workqueue.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- > 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
