On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Simon Horman wrote:
> > I agree it's not nice to have to do this, but this is largely because
> > of shmobile doing things differently from all other ARM platforms, on
> > which the respective patches tend to clean up things and reduce the
> > number of type casts.
> >
> > The only alternative I can see is for shmobile to introduce its own
> > mach/io.h file with the relaxed type checking, but that would only
> > defer the problem until the point where you want shmobile to be part
> > of the common multiplatform kernel binary.
>
> If it is needed in the long term, then I'm happy with it going in now.
> Could you remove the portion that Paul objected to?
Yes, I already did that.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
