On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Ola Lilja wrote: > I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. We have > "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP I2S-block > is > not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at the > same time.
> Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on the > platform_name instead? No, having no platform driver means a direct device<->device link (like baseband<->CODEC). You could always register the platform with a -dma added in the name or something, it'd be a bit more code but it'd work, but the framework doesn't particularly care what you call these things. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
