On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 16:47 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Given that the xenvm machine is based on vexpress but with an extremely > limited selection of peripherals (the guest is supposed to use virtual > devices instead), add "xen,xenvm" to the list of compatible machines in > mach-vexpress. > > > Changes in v2: > > - remove include skeleton; > - use #address-cells = <2> and #size-cells = <2>; > - remove the debug bootargs; > - use memory@80000000 instead of memory; > - remove the ranges and interrupt-map from the motherboard node; > - set the machine compatible to "xen,xenvm-4.2", "xen,xenvm"; > - rename the dts file to xenvm-4.2.dts; > - add "xen,xenvm" to the list of compatible DT strings to mach-vexpress. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> > CC: Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com> > CC: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/xenvm-4.2.dts | 64 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Makefile.boot | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c | 1 + > 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/xenvm-4.2.dts
I'm still not 100% convinced that the DTS is really necessary there, but as to the v2m.c change: Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com> Cheers! Pawel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/