On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:57:23AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Shaun Ruffell <sruff...@digium.com> wrote: > > > > I posted patches [1,2,3] that resolve the issue for me. Shaohui Xie > > also hit the issue and posted a slightly different patch [4]. The > > patches are currently waiting for Mauro, who I understand is > > catching up since returning from San Diego, to check them out. > > > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134764595921752&w=2 > > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134764594721747&w=2 > > [3] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134764597921761&w=2 > > [4] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=134753579818528&w=2 > > That first patch needs a sign-off from you, since you are passing on > somebody elses patch. > > Looking at that patch, the patch seems to be a memory leak (?) leaking > the "channels" allocation, along with fixing an odd and incorrect
Yes. > kfree (and access) of mci->csrows[i]. If that is correct, please write Right. > a proper changelog. The current changelog for that thing is totally > pointless, and doesn't actually explain what the patch *does*. Sorry I'll send the fix with more complete changelog in a standalone patch for review. > I'd also like some ack's from people, and I'd love to know which > commit introduced the problem(s). If this problem is new to 3.6, I > want to know what caused it, and if it is *not* new, then the thing > needs to be marked for stable. Please? It's a new bug to 3.6. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
