On 09/23/2012 02:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:27:35PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:50:29PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: >>> On 09/22/2012 05:56 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >>>> And now the prime suspect is the new CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS=y. Do these >>>> warnings ever show up with CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS=n? >>> >>> It seems that disabling that does make the warnings go away. >>> >>> I'll keep the tests running in case it just reduces the chances or something >>> like that. >> >> Thank you for testing this! >> >> And of course the reason that I didn't see these problems is that I >> failed to update my tests to enable CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS. :-/ > > Also the fact that I run 32-bit guests on x86. Sigh! > > I take it that you are running 64-bit guests?
Yes, that's correct. Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
