Hi Mauro,

Today's linux-next merge of the edac tree got a conflict in 
drivers/edac/edac_mc.c between commit faa2ad09c01c ("edac_mc: edac_mc_free() 
cannot assume mem_ctl_info is registered in sysfs") from Linus' tree and commit 
12c3ab9422cc ("edac: edac_mc_free() cannot assume mem_ctl_info is registered in 
sysfs") from the edac tree.

Two versions of the same patch. I just used the version from the edac
tree and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

Attachment: pgpWSd1NV6n6Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to