On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 07:49:37PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 07:24 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:59:32PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> On 09/23/2012 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 02:57:19PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>>> We can not directly call kvm_release_pfn_clean to release the pfn
> >>>> since we can meet noslot pfn which is used to cache mmio info into
> >>>> spte
> >>>>
> >>> Wouldn't it be better to move the check into kvm_release_pfn_clean()?
> >>
> >> I think there is no reason for us to prefer to adding this branch in
> >> the common code. :)
> >
> > Is the function performance critical? Is function called without the check
> > on a hot path? The function already contains much heavier kvm_is_mmio_pfn()
> > check. If most/all function invocation require check before call it's
> > better to move it inside.
>
> It is not most/all functions need do this check - it is only needed on x86 mmu
> page-fault/prefetch path.
At least on x86 there 7 calls to kvm_release_pfn_clean(), 5 of them are
guarded by is_noslot_pfn() (after this patch) and one by even stronger
is_error_pfn(). I guess when/if other architectures will add MMIO MMU
caching they will need to guard kvm_release_pfn_clean() by is_noslot_pfn()
too in most cases. I am not insisting, but as this patch shows it is
easy to miss the check before calling the function.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
