Michal Nazarewicz <m...@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03 2012, George Spelvin <li...@horizon.com> wrote: >> Shrink the reciprocal approximations used in put_dec_full4 >> based on the comments in put_dec_full9. > > Have you verified that the comment is correct?
I rechecked all the validity limits myself. >> r = (q * 0xcd) >> 11; > If you are changing everything, this could also be changed to: > > r = (q * 0x67) >> 10; > > no? Also in those comments is a statement I did *not* recheck, as it didn't affect correctness, saying that 0xcd produces shorter code than 0x67 on x86 (if the code is generated using shifts and adds). That's why I left it that way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/