Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com> wrote: >Hey, > >Op 25-09-12 05:39, Eric W. Biederman schreef: >> Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com> writes: >> >>> This reverts commit ee3efa91e240f513898050ef305a49a653c8ed90. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@canonical.com> >>> >>> My thread about the regression seemed to have been ignored, so I can >only >>> conclude nobody objects against a full revert of this patch. >>> >>> My testcase is simply booting through netboot with / and ~/nfs as >separate >>> nfs filesystems, then doing 'ls ~/nfs' followed by 'ls ~' in a >gnome-terminal >>> window, then I get: >> Do I read your description correctly: Without using a bind mount you >> have the same nfs filesystem mounted on / and on ~/nfs? >> >> Something is definitely off with your configuration but if to work >you >> need to move mount points around then that something seems much >deeper >> than the __d_unalias change. >> >> What filesystems do you have mounted where? >> >/ is a nfs filesystem, ~/nfs is a different nfs filesystem.
Are both filesystems on the same server? Are the two filesystems distinct filesystem on the server? Unless there is duplication of something somewhere the d_unalias code should not trigger. > Just doing >ls / is enough >to make all filesystems mounted on / return -EBUSY and disappear. > >I also have a subdir of ~/nfs/ bind mounted to /lib/modules/$(uname >-r)/kernel >for easy debugging so just doing 'make' in the kernel tree is enough to >get the >new modules + bzImage, but I don't know if it is a factor in >reproducing this bug >or not. Unlikely. But interesting. It at least fits the criteria of showing up to different places. It should not be enough for d_materialise uniqe. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
