Andries, > is very little interaction to start with. And the final AND that truncates > to the final size of the hash chain kills the high order bits. > No good. I didn't realise you were bit-masking down to the required size. Yes, it would be pretty useless in that case. Ralph. > > Andries > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [rfc] Near-constant time d... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [rfc] Near-constant ti... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [rfc] Near-consta... tytso
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [rfc] Near-co... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [rfc] Near-constant ti... tytso
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Kai Henningsen
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ex... Ralph Loader
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index fo... Guest section DW
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory inde... Ralph Loader
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory inde... Ralph Loader
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ex... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ex... Jonathan Morton
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index fo... Andreas Dilger
- Re: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2 Andries . Brouwer