On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:16:45AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:23:54PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > +static bool __init check_ioapic_information(void) > > +{ > > + int idx; > > + > > + for (idx = 0; idx < nr_ioapics; ++idx) { > > That ++idx looks odd - and it looks like the file has a combination of > i++ and ++i. Any particular reason for using this particular one instead > of the more common: "idx++" ? Or just habit?
Well, it's just a habbit from my time with C++ :) -- AMD Operating System Research Center Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach General Managers: Alberto Bozzo Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/