Vivek Goyal <vgo...@redhat.com> writes: > At quite a few places we use the keyword "service_tree" and I feel that > names in CFQ are already very long and they need to be shortened a bit > where appropriate. > > So this patch just renames "service_tree" to "st" at most of the places. > No functionality change.
NACK. > - struct cfq_rb_root service_trees[2][3]; > - struct cfq_rb_root service_tree_idle; > + struct cfq_rb_root sts[2][3]; > + struct cfq_rb_root st_idle; Honestly, who looks at sts and thinks "service trees?" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
