Ok, so you don`t know. Well, then it looks like what I said, to me. What
is a 100us load, that gets filtered by a 10ms filter? Nothing.
Or a very very small value that rises and falls over 10ms.
Load-distribution based on a spike that happened a long time ago (in
computing terms) seems very odd. You don`t even know the average before
5ms.
I am going to look at the code, and see if I can make a patch.
Peace Be With You.
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 04:50:02 +0200, Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de> wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:24 +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote:
Are you sure this isn`t just a design-philosophy that was done, without
much knowledge of filters?
Are you? I see "I don't see the point", along with "I haven't looked
closely". If you look, perhaps you'll see a better way, and can post
patches. That's the strength of opensource.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
