On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:29:51AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > There are still quite a few interesting cases that devtmpfs does not > even think about supporting. Cases that were reported when devtmpfs was > being reviewed.
Care to refresh my memory? > Additionally the devtmpfs maintainership has not dealt with legitimate > concerns any better than this firmware issue has been dealt with. I > still haven't even hear a productive suggestion back on the hole > /dev/ptmx mess. I don't know how to handle the /dev/ptmx issue properly from within devtmpfs, does anyone? Proposals are always welcome, the last time this came up a week or so ago, I don't recall seeing any proposals, just a general complaint. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
