3.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>

commit 1d55f6bcc0331d744cd5b56c4ee79e3809438161 upstream.

This patch fixes sector_t overflow checking in dm-verity.

Without this patch, the code checks for overflow only if sector_t is
smaller than long long, not if sector_t and long long have the same size.

Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <a...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-verity.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity.c
@@ -718,8 +718,8 @@ static int verity_ctr(struct dm_target *
        v->hash_dev_block_bits = ffs(num) - 1;
 
        if (sscanf(argv[5], "%llu%c", &num_ll, &dummy) != 1 ||
-           num_ll << (v->data_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT) !=
-           (sector_t)num_ll << (v->data_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT)) {
+           (sector_t)(num_ll << (v->data_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT))
+           >> (v->data_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT) != num_ll) {
                ti->error = "Invalid data blocks";
                r = -EINVAL;
                goto bad;
@@ -733,8 +733,8 @@ static int verity_ctr(struct dm_target *
        }
 
        if (sscanf(argv[6], "%llu%c", &num_ll, &dummy) != 1 ||
-           num_ll << (v->hash_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT) !=
-           (sector_t)num_ll << (v->hash_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT)) {
+           (sector_t)(num_ll << (v->hash_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT))
+           >> (v->hash_dev_block_bits - SECTOR_SHIFT) != num_ll) {
                ti->error = "Invalid hash start";
                r = -EINVAL;
                goto bad;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to