Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 15:27 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> I'm puzzled as well. Any ideas if I should do anything here or not? > > So I think the current v3.5.5 code is fine. Now I'm puzzled. You wrote: | However, since we don't restart the tick, we won't be sampling load muck | and calling calc_load_exit_idle() from there is bound to confuse state. Doesn't that mean 900404e5d201 "sched: Add missing call to calc_load_exit_idle()" which is part of 3.5.5 was problematic? Or did I just miscount the number of "not"s? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
