On 12-10-05 12:16 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 11:59:29AM -0600, mathieu.poir...@linaro.org wrote: >> From: "Mathieu J. Poirier" <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org> >> >> Andrew, >> >> After requesting a number of changes that, to my understanding >> have been implemented, I have not been able to get the attention >> of the subsystem maintainer on this patch. >> >> If there are still issues, I'm open to making changes but I want >> to make sure it doesn't get forgotten. If there no objections, >> would you consider queuint it ? > > Mathieu, > > I have the same objection as before: using platform device solely for > the purpose of passing some data from board code to the driver. Surely > there are other ways of passing this bit of data... What about, for > example, making it an empty weak symbol so that board code could > override it with strong one?
Thanks for the comments - I will implement a weak function in the keyreset driver. Mathieu. > > Thanks. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
