On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 19:32 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > 2) Are the tracepoints done in a way that it's not going to cause "ABI" > > issues. If not then we need to redesign the tracepoints. > > Btw, this we should be asking ourselves about *all* TPs, especially if > they're in generic code.
I agree, and I'm starting to think I shouldn't have given free reign over the TPs to system maintainers. That is, I should have pushed harder to understand all tracepoints added to code to make sure the maintainer knows that it can become an ABI. Some maintainers don't worry about it. But I can see it coming back to haunt them. In the end, it will hurt the maintainer of the code, which is why I gave the ownership of tracepoints to locations where they are at (instead of a "joint" ownership). But I probably should have been a TP cop for a while to allow them to understand the consequences first. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/