On 10/06/2012 10:57 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Maybe it's just me, but that's somehow sad for one if() and a su
> btraction
>
> BTW __pa used to be a simple subtraction, the if () was just added to
> handle the few call sites for x86-64 that do __pa(&text_symbol).
> Maybe we should just go back to the old __pa_symbol() for those cases,
> then __pa could be the simple subtraction it used to was again
> and it could be inlined and everyone would be happy.
>
I wonder how much the double-mapping actually buys us, if we could get a
PIE-type memory model that doesn't try to create GOT references.
We would unambiguously lose out the cases where we currently can do
symbol(index) but I wonder how much the impact actually is.
The advantage would be that it would give us way more room to do kernel
space ASR.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
