3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Mathias Krause <mini...@googlemail.com>

[ Upstream commit 864745d291b5ba80ea0bd0edcbe67273de368836 ]

When dump_one_state() returns an error, e.g. because of a too small
buffer to dump the whole xfrm state, xfrm_state_netlink() returns NULL
instead of an error pointer. But its callers expect an error pointer
and therefore continue to operate on a NULL skbuff.

This could lead to a privilege escalation (execution of user code in
kernel context) if the attacker has CAP_NET_ADMIN and is able to map
address 0.

Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <mini...@googlemail.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klass...@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 7cae73e..a092828 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -862,6 +862,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *xfrm_state_netlink(struct sk_buff 
*in_skb,
 {
        struct xfrm_dump_info info;
        struct sk_buff *skb;
+       int err;
 
        skb = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
        if (!skb)
@@ -872,9 +873,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *xfrm_state_netlink(struct sk_buff 
*in_skb,
        info.nlmsg_seq = seq;
        info.nlmsg_flags = 0;
 
-       if (dump_one_state(x, 0, &info)) {
+       err = dump_one_state(x, 0, &info);
+       if (err) {
                kfree_skb(skb);
-               return NULL;
+               return ERR_PTR(err);
        }
 
        return skb;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to