3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Gao feng <gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ Upstream commit 6825a26c2dc21eb4f8df9c06d3786ddec97cf53b ]
as we hold dst_entry before we call __ip6_del_rt,
so we should alse call dst_release not only return
-ENOENT when the rt6_info is ip6_null_entry.
and we already hold the dst entry, so I think it's
safe to call dst_release out of the write-read lock.
Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaof...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 2e21751..488a1b7 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1435,17 +1435,18 @@ static int __ip6_del_rt(struct rt6_info *rt, struct
nl_info *info)
struct fib6_table *table;
struct net *net = dev_net(rt->rt6i_dev);
- if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry)
- return -ENOENT;
+ if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry) {
+ err = -ENOENT;
+ goto out;
+ }
table = rt->rt6i_table;
write_lock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
-
err = fib6_del(rt, info);
- dst_release(&rt->dst);
-
write_unlock_bh(&table->tb6_lock);
+out:
+ dst_release(&rt->dst);
return err;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
