Userland should use a different query mechanism.  On the other hand, it will 
not hurt either.  On pre-xsave kernels AVX is a non-option.

Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:51 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 3.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me
>know.
>> 
>> ------------------
>> 
>> From: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]>
>> 
>> commit c6fd893da927c6cefb2ece22402765379921a834 upstream.
>> 
>> Clear AVX, AVX2 features along with clearing XSAVE feature bits,
>> as part of the parsing "noxsave" parameter.
>> 
>> Fixes the kernel boot panic with "noxsave" boot parameter.
>> 
>> We could have checked cpu_has_osxsave along with cpu_has_avx etc, but
>Peter
>> mentioned clearing the feature bits will be better for uses like
>> static_cpu_has() etc.
>
>This was marked as needed for 3.5 only - presumably because the kernel
>wasn't using AVX before this - but don't we also need to clear these
>bits even in earlier versions so userland knows not to use it?
>
>Ben.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <[email protected]>
>> Link:
>http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
>> 
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c |    2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>> @@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ static int __init x86_xsave_setup(char *
>>  {
>>      setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE);
>>      setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT);
>> +    setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_AVX);
>> +    setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_AVX2);
>>      return 1;
>>  }
>>  __setup("noxsave", x86_xsave_setup);

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to