On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 02:02:08AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 14:21 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> [...]
> > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(link_quirk, "Don't clea
> > * handshake done). There are two failure modes: "usec" have passed
> > (major
> > * hardware flakeout), or the register reads as all-ones (hardware
> > removed).
> > */
> > -static int handshake(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, void __iomem *ptr,
> > +int handshake(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, void __iomem *ptr,
> > u32 mask, u32 done, int usec)
> > {
> > u32 result;
> [...]
>
> I don't think it matters for stable, but since this function is now
> extern it should have an 'xhci_' prefix.
Is it a non-issue? I know several other drivers have a handshake
function, including the EHCI driver. If both xHCI and EHCI is built-in,
will the EHCI driver compile? I'll have to double check this...
Thanks for catching this!
Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
