On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, David L. Nicol wrote:
> I've thought that it would be good to break up the different
> clustering frills -- node identification, process migration,
> process hosting, distributed memory, yadda yadda blah, into
> separate bite-sized portions.
It would also be good to share parts of the infrastructure
between the different clustering architectures ...
> Is there a good list to discuss this on? Is this the list?
> Which pieces of clustering-scheme patches would be good to have?
I know each of the cluster projects have mailing lists, but
I've never heard of a list where the different projects come
together to eg. find out which parts of the infrastructure
they could share, or ...
Since I agree with you that we need such a place, I've just
created a mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the list, send an email with the text
"subscribe linux-cluster" to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope that we'll be able to split out some infrastructure
stuff from the different cluster projects and we'll be able
to put cluster support into the kernel in such a way that
we won't have to make the choice which of the N+1 cluster
projects should make it into the kernel...
regards,
Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
