On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC <drasko.drasko...@gmail.com> wrote: > [Me] >> If I understand correctly the below more or less exports >> struct irq_chip to userspace, >> trying to hide it by instead exposing a property of the >> containing struct gpio_chip and it worries me. > > No, it should not.
You are exporting all of the defines from irq.h, IRQ_TYPE_NONE, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING, etc to userspace. These are defined in <linux/irq.h> and that file has this comment on top: /* * Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held * within this file. * * Thanks. --rmk */ And that comment is even only about generic *KERNEL* code, userspace is way, way more than that. > It operates only on already exported gpiochip > (similar to gpio_export_link()). > It just helps exported GPIO be configured in "interrupt" and not in > "normal" mode. So can you explain exactly why userspace want to configure GPIO pins in interrupt mode, when there is no way whatsoever for userspace to handle these IRQs? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/