Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Evil idea of the day: non-directory (even non-existant) mount points and
> > non-directory mounts. So then "mount --bind /etc/foo /dev/bar" works.
>
> Try it. It _does_ work.
Yeah, mount --bind is cool, I've been using it on one of my projects
today. But - maybe I'm just not thinking creatively enough - what are
the advantages of mount --bind versus just symlinking?
Also, I tried mount --bind fileone filetwo, and it fails if filetwo
doesn't exist. ('mount point filetwo doesn't exist'). Is that supposed
to work? (using mount from latest redhat beta)
BTW, pivot_root is nifty, too. ;-)
regards,
David
--
David L. Parsley
Network Administrator
Roanoke College
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespace... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process name... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Marco d'Itri
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... David L. Parsley
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process ... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces fo... Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Li... David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Andries . Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH][CFT] per-process namespaces for Linux Alexander Viro

