On 12 October 2012 20:11, Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevche...@intel.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 19:36 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > I meant is to use that constant instead of hard coding 4 everywhere. > It's a maximum value, not the SoC specific.
Can be done. >> + u32 val, arr[4]; > what about to use tmp name instead of val? It's really minor, but I > think val name is little bit unrelated to a loop counter. Its not minor at all, its major. Even when i was coding it, i thought about renaming it several times during this last patch. But couldn't find a better name. I don't like tmp. Give me something better. viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
