Hi, On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:47:35AM -0300, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote: > The STOTG04 is an replacement for ISP1301. > > Most of the registers on STOTG04 are the same as on ISP1301, but the > register ISP1301_I2C_OTG_CONTROL_2 (address 0x10) doesn't exist on the > ST part. > > This is a work around for this by using the interrupt source register that > should behave the same on both parts and has the needed information. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes....@gmail.com> > --- > > This patch is very important to LPC32xx users. IMHO this should go in for > 3.7-rc2. > > drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c > b/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c > index f696fb9..21a9861 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c > @@ -2930,10 +2930,10 @@ static void vbus_work(struct work_struct *work) > > /* Get the VBUS status from the transceiver */ > value = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(udc->isp1301_i2c_client, > - ISP1301_I2C_OTG_CONTROL_2); > + ISP1301_I2C_INTERRUPT_SOURCE); > > /* VBUS on or off? */ > - if (value & OTG_B_SESS_VLD) > + if (value & INT_SESS_VLD)
why isn't this using a PHY driver instead ? > udc->vbus = 1; > else > udc->vbus = 0; > -- > 1.7.10 > -- balbi
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
