On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Also, the proposed solution might hide some other important errors. We may >>> need >>> to terminate transfers when we found that an error is there in last >>> transfers: >> I think it could be better than first solution, but what do you think >> about marking each transfer with corresponding id? > > But dma_test expects the transfer to finish within timeout. If it > doesn't, then that's > an error. > > So, for testing your s/w emulation, you must pass higher timeout. And > terminating > transfers for error case would be better, to make them timeout safe.
Yeah, seems the patch is not necessary. In case of software emulation we just have a test passed much slow... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
