On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:08:41PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Fair enough but it wouldn't be a good idea that add new unlikely branch
> > in allocator's fast path. Please move the check into slow path which could
> > be in __alloc_pages_slowpath.
> 
> Thanks for your comment.
> 
> I have considered to add the branch into gfp_to_alloc_flags() before,
> but didn't do it because I see that get_page_from_freelist() may use
> the GFP_IO or GFP_FS flag at least in zone_reclaim() path.

Good point. You can check it in __zone_reclaim and change gfp_mask of 
scan_control
because it's never hot path.

> 
> So could you make sure it is safe to move the branch into
> __alloc_pages_slowpath()?  If so, I will add the check into
> gfp_to_alloc_flags().

How about this?

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index d976957..b3607fa 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2614,10 +2614,16 @@ retry_cpuset:
        page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL, nodemask, order,
                        zonelist, high_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
                        preferred_zone, migratetype);
-       if (unlikely(!page))
+       if (unlikely(!page)) {
+               /*
+                * Resume path can deadlock because block device
+                * isn't active yet.
+                */
+               if (unlikely(tsk_memalloc_no_io(current)))
+                       gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
                page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_mask, order,
                                zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask,
                                preferred_zone, migratetype);
+       }
 
        trace_mm_page_alloc(page, order, gfp_mask, migratetype);
 
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index b5e45f4..6c2ccdd 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3290,6 +3290,16 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t 
gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
        };
        unsigned long nr_slab_pages0, nr_slab_pages1;
 
+       if (unlikely(tsk_memalloc_no_io(current))) {
+               sc.gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
+               shrink.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask;
+               /*
+                * We allow to reclaim only clean pages.
+                * It can affect RECLAIM_SWAP and RECLAIM_WRITE mode
+                * but this is really rare event and allocator can
                 * fallback to other zones.
+                */
+               sc.may_writepage = 0;
+               sc.may_swap = 0;
+       }
+
        cond_resched();
        /*
         * We need to be able to allocate from the reserves for RECLAIM_SWAP


> 
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Ming Lei
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majord...@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"d...@kvack.org";> em...@kvack.org </a>

-- 
Kind Regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to