On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:58:17 +0100 Ian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 20:06 +0100, Mukesh Rathor wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:52:17 +0100 > > Ian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > drivers/xen/cpu_hotplug.c | 4 +++- > > > > drivers/xen/events.c | 9 ++++++++- > > > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_client.c | 3 ++- > > > > 7 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > > union { > > > struct { > > > unsigned long gdt_frames[16], gdt_ents; > > > } pv; > > > struct { > > > unsigned long gdtaddr, gdtsz; > > > } pvh; > > > } gdt; > > > > > > (I've gone with naming the union gdt instead of u. You might want > > > therefore to also drop the gdt prefix from the members?) > > > > Is it worth it, I mean, making it a union. Would you be OK if I just > > used gdt_frames[0] and gdt_ends for gdtaddr and size? > > What's the problem with making it a union? Seems like you are 80% of > the way there. No problem. It resutls in a patch on xen side too. I'll send that too. > units AFAICT and so can be combined. > > How come you don't need the same stuff for ldt*? Happens natively. Isn't PVH great! thanks mukesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
