On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 21:18 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > /* did other CPU force QS recently? > > */ > > - long blimit; /* Upper limit on a processed batch > > */ > > + int blimit; /* Upper limit on a processed batch > > */ > > > > /* 3) dynticks interface. */ > > + int dynticks_snap; /* Per-GP tracking for dynticks. */ > > struct rcu_dynticks *dynticks; /* Shared per-CPU dynticks state. */ > > - int dynticks_snap; /* Per-GP tracking for dynticks. */ > > Hm, no words in change log for shuffling dynticks_snap...
I dont like adding two 32bit holes on a structure ;) This kind of trivial things dont need a changelog, especially when fixing a critical bug. I let Paul add this if he really wants. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
