On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38:55PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > > > Sounds good. Is it possible to verify that policy_cache isn't getting > > > larger than normal in /proc/slabinfo, i.e. when all processes with a > > > task mempolicy or shared vma policy have exited, are there still a > > > significant number of active objects? > > > > Killing the fuzzer caused it to drop dramatically. > > > Excellent, thanks. This shows that the refcounting is working properly > and we're not leaking any references as a result of this change causing > the mempolicies to never be freed. ("numa_policy" turns out to be > policy_cache in the code, so thanks for checking both of them.) > > Could I add your tested-by?
Sure. Here's a fresh one I just baked. Tested-by: Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/