On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > > Do we actually need to test PF_KTHREAD when current->mm == NULL? > > Perhaps because of aio threads whcih temporarily adopt a userspace mm? > > I believe so. I remember I discussed this in the past with David > Rientjes and he advised me to test for both. >
PF_KTHREAD can do use_mm() to assume an ->mm but hopefully they aren't allocating slab while doing so. Have you considered actually charging current->mm->owner for that memory, though, since the kthread will have freed the memory before unuse_mm() or otherwise have charged it on behalf of a user process, i.e. only exempting PF_KTHREAD? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
