On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:25:47PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Move the check for populated_zone() to the control statement of the > 'for' loop and get rid of the odd looking if/else block. > > Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > > include/linux/mmzone.h | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h > index 50aaca8..5bdf02e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h > @@ -913,11 +913,8 @@ extern struct zone *next_zone(struct zone *zone); > > #define for_each_populated_zone(zone) \ > for (zone = (first_online_pgdat())->node_zones; \ > - zone; \ > - zone = next_zone(zone)) \ > - if (!populated_zone(zone)) \ > - ; /* do nothing */ \ > - else > + zone && populated_zone(zone); \ > + zone = next_zone(zone))
I don't think we want to /abort/ the loop when encountering an unpopulated zone. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
