Stephane Eranian [eran...@google.com] wrote: | So all in all, I think this is not a very good idea. You have to put | this into the tool or a library that auto-detects the | host CPU and programs the right set of events. | | We've had that discussion many times. Just reiterating my personal | opinion on this.
Yes that would work too. One drawback is that the hardware events will be in the tool, while the software/tracepoint events in the kernel sysfs representation. Or is that the reason we want all events in one place (sysfs) ? Sukadev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/