On 10/22/2012 01:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 01:31 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>
>>> IIRC Fenghua experimented with that and it didn't work. Not all BIOSes
>>> use that bit to determine BSP-ness.
>>
>> What does a BIOS have to do with anything?
>>
>> The practical issue here is does an INIT IPI cause the cpu to go into
>> startup-ipi-wait or to start booting at 4G-16 bytes.
>>
>> For dealing with BIOSen we may still need to use the bootstrap processor
>> for firmware calls, cpu suspend, and other firmware weirdness, but that
>> should all be completely orthogonal to the behavior to what happens
>> when an INIT IPI is sent to the cpu.
>>
>> The only firmware problem I can imagine having is cpu virtualization
>> bug.
>>
>
> The whole problem is that some BIOSes go wonky after receiving an INIT
> (as in INIT-SIPI-SIPI) to the BSP.
>
(I presume the failure is SMM-related, but Fenghua might have more
details...)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
