On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 22 of October 2012 11:59:19 Bryan Wu wrote: >> Hiya, >> >> Can I get some Acked or Tested-by from Rafael or Miles before I put it >> in my linux-leds tree? > > Well, I just explained why the current code didn't work. :-) > > Anyway, please feel free to add > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> >
I was just reminded by Nathan Lynch <[email protected]> most of led-trigger API like register/unregister/event are potentially sleep. They should not be used in atomic context. Any suggestion to fix it? Thanks, -Bryan > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Bryan Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Linus Walleij >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Bryan Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Mutex lock is not safe in atomic context like the bug reported by >> >>> Miles Lane: >> >> (...) >> >>> This patch replace mutex lock with spin lock which is safe for this case. >> >>> >> >>> Reported-by: Miles Lane <[email protected]> >> >>> Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> >> >>> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >> >>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> Looks correct to me: >> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> >> >> >> > >> > Thanks, Linus. >> > >> > Miles, could you please help to try this patch on your testing system? >> > I really appreciate it. >> > >> > -Bryan >> > -- > I speak only for myself. > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
