* David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Provide a comment in the empty uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h to make sure that the
> patch program doesn't delete it.
>
> However, should some part of asm/hw_breakpoint.h actually be exported here,
> or, possibly, should the entire uapi file be removed? In v3.6, though the
> file was marked for export to userspace, it had nothing outside of __KERNEL__.
>
> This needs to be applied on top of the x86 UAPI disintegration patch.
Just wondering, have the tools/perf/ issues been solved in your
tree, are the x86 UAPI disintegration changes pullable?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
