On Sunday 21 of October 2012 22:35:46 Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If acpi_ds_create_walk_state() succeeds, but the call to
> ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED() fails, then we'll return from the function
> without properly freeing 'next_walk_state'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>

This has to go through ACPICA upstream, but we'll get it from there eventually.

Thanks,
Rafael


> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
> index aa9a5d4..ade59a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
> @@ -378,7 +378,8 @@ acpi_ds_call_control_method(struct acpi_thread_state 
> *thread,
>        */
>       info = ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct acpi_evaluate_info));
>       if (!info) {
> -             return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
> +             status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
> +             goto cleanup;
>       }
>  
>       info->parameters = &this_walk_state->operands[0];
> 
-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to