On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org> wrote: > Your description doesn't include why we need new vmevent_fd(2). > Of course, it's very flexible and potential to add new VM knob easily but > the thing we is about to use now is only VMEVENT_ATTR_PRESSURE. > Is there any other use cases for swap or free? or potential user? > Adding vmevent_fd without them is rather overkill.
What ABI would you use instead? On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org> wrote: > I don't object but we need rationale for adding new system call which should > be maintained forever once we add it. Agreed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
