On Thursday 25 October 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:27:36 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 24 October 2012, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> > > For Armada 370/XP we have the same problem that for the commit
> > > cb01b63, so we applied the same solution: "The default 256 KiB
> > > coherent pool may be too small for some of the Kirkwood devices, so
> > > increase it to make sure that devices will be able to allocate their
> > > buffers with GFP_ATOMIC flag"
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > Do you know why the ATA driver needs this? I find it surprising that
> > it's necessary, so I'd like to make sure we're not just working around
> > a device driver bug here.
>
> The sata_mv driver create dma_pool and allocate objects from them, and
> all the memory allocated for dma_pools is allocated using
> dma_alloc_coherent(), and I guess the driver is using too much of them.
>
> Seems like the driver is too lazy and allocates everything coherent to
> avoid the hassle of doing dma_map/dma_unmap operations when needed, but
> I haven't looked in details at the driver yet to see if it would be
> possible to switch those DMA coherent allocations into non-coherent
> allocations + appropriate calls to the DMA operations.
Using coherent allocations is fine, I was wondering whether they need
to be atomic or not.
> That said, that's for sure a larger task than just enabling SATA on
> Armada 370/XP, so I would advocate to handle this problem separately.
Agreed.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
