On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 14:25 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On 16 October 2012 09:49, Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote: > > dw_dmac driver already supports device tree but it used to have its platform > > data passed the non-DT way. > > > > This patch does following changes: > > - pass platform data via DT, non-DT way still takes precedence if both are > > used. > > - create generic filter routine > > - Earlier slave information was made available by slave specific filter > > routines > > in chan->private field. Now, this information would be passed from within > > dmac > > DT node. Slave drivers would now be required to pass bus_id (a string) as > > parameter to this generic filter(), which would be compared against the > > slave > > data passed from DT, by the generic filter routine. > > - Update binding document > > I can see that you applied these patches and they are present in > linux-next. But i feel > the order of patches is bad. Yes looks like I forgot to sort the mbox series :(
since all patches were applied nicely, and they seem fairly independent of each other it should cause issue. Let me know if you wnat me to redo my -next. -- Vinod Koul Intel Corp. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
