From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:25:08 +0200
> David, > > On 09/19/2012 01:55 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >> This is an enhancement work that began several years ago. I try to catchup >> with >> some performance improvement that has been implemented then by Havard. >> The ring index logic and the TX error path modification are the biggest >> changes >> but some cleanup/debugging have been added along the way. >> The GEM revision will benefit from the Gigabit support. >> >> The series has been tested on several Atmel AT91 SoC with the two MACB/GEM >> flavors. >> >> v2: - modify the tx error handling: now uses a workqueue >> - information provided by ethtool -i were not accurate: removed > > I am about to re-send this patch series. Should I rebase it on top of > Joachim's recent modifications? I mean, I plan to rebase them on top of > net-next, is it the proper thing to do? You should always base your patch on whatever tree you want your patches applied to. If you have a dependency on something not in that tree (for example, you need something in the 'net' tree) you have to tell me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
