> -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwri...@ni.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:05 PM > To: a...@kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; John > Linn; Nick Bowler; Michal Simek > Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC > > This makes the definition of VMALLOC_END suitable for use within assembly > code. This is necessary to allow the use of VMALLOC_END in defining where the > early uart is mapped for use with DEBUG_LL. > > Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwri...@ni.com> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h > index 08c1231..72904a2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ > */ > #define VMALLOC_OFFSET (8*1024*1024) > #define VMALLOC_START (((unsigned long)high_memory + > VMALLOC_OFFSET) & ~(VMALLOC_OFFSET-1)) > -#define VMALLOC_END 0xff000000UL > +#define VMALLOC_END _AC(0xff000000,UL)
This shouldn't be the part of this series but should go to mainline through different tree. Arnd, Olof: Can you take this patch to your arm-soc tree? I don't think it is a good workstyle to propose it to mainline through zynq soc tree. What do you think? Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
