Hi Ben,
On 10/27/2012 11:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:06 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > [...] >> #define __NR_available287 287 >> -__SYSCALL(287, sys_faccessat, 0) >> +__SYSCALL(287, sys_ni_syscall, 0) > [...] > > Why was this one un-plumbed rather than properly numbered (#define > __NR_faccessat)? I can only speculate, that this was probably a copy/paste error that has been there for a long time. __NR_faccessat is (and was) defined as number 301. Given that 287 was never defined, it's save to fix the table entry and set it to sys_ni_syscall. unistd.h: [...] #define __NR_faccessat 301 __SYSCALL(301, sys_faccessat, 4) [...] Thanks, -Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
