On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:41:20PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > From: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org> > > There is very little difference in the TIF_SECCOMP and TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE > path in entry-common.S. In order to add support for > CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER without mangling the assembly too badly, > seccomp was moved into the syscall_trace_enter() handler. > > Additionally, the return value for secure_computing() is now checked > and a -1 value will result in the system call being skipped.
This is too ugly. Just expand the calls of ptrace_syscall_trace() into both callers and do secure_computing() hookup in there. And for pity sake, would somebody rename the damn thing? It's *dripping* with marketdroidese... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/