On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Peter LaDow wrote: > Anyway, based on earlier discussion, is there any reason not to use a > lock (presuming any solution properly takes into account possible > recursion)? I understand that the mainline is protected, but perhaps > in the RT version we can use seqlock (and prevent a recursive lock)?
Have you tried 3.6.3-rt9? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
