On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:19:44, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > > > As far as lck clock node is concerned, we had deliberately dropped all leaf- > > node clocks from the clock tree, please refer to the description mentioned > > in - > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101987.html > > Ach, should have remembered that :-( Indeed there is an LCDC hwmod: > > static struct omap_hwmod am33xx_lcdc_hwmod = { > .name = "lcdc", > .class = &am33xx_lcdc_hwmod_class, > .clkdm_name = "lcdc_clkdm", > .mpu_irqs = am33xx_lcdc_irqs, > .flags = HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE | HWMOD_SWSUP_MSTANDBY, > .main_clk = "lcd_gclk", > .prcm = { > .omap4 = { > .clkctrl_offs = AM33XX_CM_PER_LCDC_CLKCTRL_OFFSET, > .modulemode = MODULEMODE_SWCTRL, > }, > }, > }; > > > >From LCDC driver perspective, driver is using, > > > > fb_clk = clk_get(&device->dev, NULL); > > > > This I feel needs to be corrected for valid name as per Spec (mostly I > > would > > vote for "fck") and then every platform should make sure that it returns > > valid clock-node for it. > > > > Change in Driver would be, > > > > fb_clk = clk_get(&device->dev, "fck"); >
Ok, thanks. Let me submit patch for this. Thanks, Vaibhav > Indeed. > > > - Paul > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
